Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds support for OSC 7 which is the same as OSC 9;9 but using
file URIs. As per the previous discussion in #8214, the problem is
that WSL shells emit URIs that can't work because the hostname in
the URI translates to an UNC path with an non-existing hostname.
In my opinion this doesn't deter the fact though that OSC 7 works
just fine for a native Windows application.
In the future we should consider trying to detect WSL file URIs
and translating it to the
--cdargument forwsl.exe.All of the heavy lifting for parsing the URI is done by
PathCreateFromUrlW. It just had to be plugged into the OSC 9;9 code.Closes #3158
Validation Steps Performed
IsValidDirectoryI know that OSC 7 works ✅)