A PR for testing performance benchmark report

[liquidsec]

never merge this

[github-actions]

📊 Performance Benchmark Report

Comparing benchmark-tests (baseline) vs benchmark-fakebad (current)

📈 Detailed Results (All Benchmarks)

📋 Complete results for all benchmarks - includes both significant and insignificant changes

🧪 Test Name	📏 Base	📏 Current	📈 Change	🎯 Status
Bloom Filter Dns Mutation Tracking Performance	8.16ms	175.84ms	+2053.6% 🔴🔴🔴	⚠️
Bloom Filter Large Scale Dns Brute Force	36.53ms	1.269s	+3374.5% 🔴🔴🔴	⚠️
Large Closest Match Lookup	352.65ms	357.05ms	+1.2% ⚪	✅
Realistic Closest Match Workload	192.48ms	196.66ms	+2.2% ⚪	✅
Event Validation Full Scan Startup Small Batch	436.46ms	463.57ms	+6.2% ⚪	✅
Event Validation Full Scan Startup Large Batch	785.57ms	803.34ms	+2.3% ⚪	✅
Make Event Autodetection Small	31.67ms	31.21ms	-1.5% ⚪	✅
Make Event Autodetection Large	320.26ms	313.67ms	-2.1% ⚪	✅
Make Event Explicit Types	14.04ms	13.91ms	-0.9% ⚪	✅
Excavate Single Thread Small	4.104s	4.053s	-1.2% ⚪	✅
Excavate Single Thread Large	9.427s	9.492s	+0.7% ⚪	✅
Excavate Parallel Tasks Small	4.214s	4.214s	+0.0% ⚪	✅
Excavate Parallel Tasks Large	7.261s	7.221s	-0.5% ⚪	✅
Is Ip Performance	3.13ms	3.21ms	+2.6% ⚪	✅
Make Ip Type Performance	11.30ms	11.32ms	+0.2% ⚪	✅
Mixed Ip Operations	4.48ms	4.49ms	+0.2% ⚪	✅
Typical Queue Shuffle	63.68µs	64.51µs	+1.3% ⚪	✅
Priority Queue Shuffle	703.61µs	714.68µs	+1.6% ⚪	✅

🎯 Performance Summary

! 2 regressions ⚠️
  16 unchanged ✅

🔍 Significant Changes (>10%)

• Bloom Filter Dns Mutation Tracking Performance: 2053.6% 🐌 slower
• Bloom Filter Large Scale Dns Brute Force: 3374.5% 🐌 slower

---

🐍 Python Version 3.11.13

[liquidsec]

this is no longer needed.