Skip to content

[Improvement-18249][DAO] Route ProjectUserMapper access through ProjectUserDao#18262

Open
ruanwenjun wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:devfrom
ruanwenjun:dao/project-user
Open

[Improvement-18249][DAO] Route ProjectUserMapper access through ProjectUserDao#18262
ruanwenjun wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:devfrom
ruanwenjun:dao/project-user

Conversation

@ruanwenjun
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Was this PR generated or assisted by AI?

YES, gpt 5.5

Purpose of the pull request

Introduce ProjectUserDao so the api layer depends only on the repository abstraction. The Dao exposes queryProjectRelation as a straight delegate and packages deleteProjectRelation as void since the row-count return was never consulted at the api call sites.

Tracking issue: #18249

Brief change log

Verify this pull request

This pull request is code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This pull request is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(or)

Pull Request Notice

Pull Request Notice

If your pull request contains incompatible change, you should also add it to docs/docs/en/guide/upgrade/incompatible.md

}
Arrays.stream(projectIds.split(Constants.COMMA)).distinct().forEach(projectId -> {
ProjectUser projectUserOld = projectUserMapper.queryProjectRelation(Integer.parseInt(projectId), userId);
ProjectUser projectUserOld = projectUserDao.queryProjectRelation(Integer.parseInt(projectId), userId);
ProjectUser projectUserOld = projectUserDao.queryProjectRelation(Integer.parseInt(projectId), userId);
if (projectUserOld != null) {
projectUserMapper.deleteProjectRelation(Integer.parseInt(projectId), userId);
projectUserDao.deleteProjectRelation(Integer.parseInt(projectId), userId);
}
Arrays.stream(projectIds.split(",")).distinct().forEach(projectId -> {
ProjectUser projectUserOld = projectUserMapper.queryProjectRelation(Integer.parseInt(projectId), userId);
ProjectUser projectUserOld = projectUserDao.queryProjectRelation(Integer.parseInt(projectId), userId);
ProjectUser projectUserOld = projectUserDao.queryProjectRelation(Integer.parseInt(projectId), userId);
if (projectUserOld != null) {
projectUserMapper.deleteProjectRelation(Integer.parseInt(projectId), userId);
projectUserDao.deleteProjectRelation(Integer.parseInt(projectId), userId);
@ruanwenjun ruanwenjun added improvement make more easy to user or prompt friendly refactor labels May 14, 2026
@ruanwenjun ruanwenjun added this to the 3.4.2 milestone May 14, 2026
@ruanwenjun ruanwenjun force-pushed the dao/project-user branch 2 times, most recently from 05a7688 to aceca63 Compare May 15, 2026 07:39
…ctUserDao

Introduce ProjectUserDao so the api layer depends only on the repository
abstraction. The Dao exposes queryProjectRelation as a straight delegate
and packages deleteProjectRelation as void since the row-count return
was never consulted at the api call sites.

Tracking issue: apache#18249
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
0.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 60%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backend improvement make more easy to user or prompt friendly refactor test

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants