Skip to content

Netty epoll transport denial of service via RST on half-closed TCP connection

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 5, 2026 in netty/netty

Package

maven io.netty:netty-transport-native-epoll (Maven)

Affected versions

< 4.2.13.Final

Patched versions

4.2.13.Final

Description

Summary

Netty's epoll transport fails to detect and close TCP connections that receive a RST after being half-closed, leading to stale channels that are never cleaned up and, in some code paths, a 100% CPU busy-loop in the event loop thread.

Affected versions

All versions of 4.2.x netty-transport-native-epoll up to and including 4.2.12.Final

Fixed in

4.2.13.Final (fix merged into the 4.2 branch via #16689; release not yet cut as of 2026-04-25).

Severity

Medium — Denial of Service (resource exhaustion / CPU spin)

CWE: CWE-772: Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime

Description

When a TCP connection using Netty's epoll transport has ALLOW_HALF_CLOSURE enabled (or is in a half-closed state via the HTTP codec), and the remote peer:

  1. Sends a FIN (half-close), causing the server to mark the input as shutdown, then
  2. Sends a RST (e.g. by closing with SO_LINGER=0)

the server-side channel is never closed. This happens because:

  • epollOutReady() is a no-op when there is no pending flush.
  • epollInReady() short-circuits via shouldBreakEpollInReady() because input is already marked as shutdown.
  • The EPOLLERR/EPOLLHUP error condition is therefore never processed, and channelInactive is never fired.

Depending on the Netty version and configuration, this results in:

  • Stale channels: The connection is never closed or deregistered. An unauthenticated remote attacker can repeat the sequence to accumulate stale connections, exhausting file descriptors, memory, or connection-count limits.
  • CPU busy-loop: In code paths where clearEpollIn0() is not called during the ChannelInputShutdownReadComplete event, epoll_wait returns immediately on every iteration for the affected fd, causing 100% CPU utilization on the event loop thread and starving all other connections multiplexed on it.

Mitigation

  • Upgrade to 4.2.13.Final when released (or build from the 4.2 branch at commit 0ec3d97).
  • If upgrading is not immediately possible, configure idle timeouts on connections to limit the lifetime of stale channels.

Resources

References

@chrisvest chrisvest published to netty/netty May 5, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 6, 2026
Reviewed May 6, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime

The product does not release a resource after its effective lifetime has ended, i.e., after the resource is no longer needed. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-42577

GHSA ID

GHSA-rwm7-x88c-3g2p

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.