Skip to content

Langflow Knowledge Bases API is Vulnerable to Path Traversal

Critical severity GitHub Reviewed Published Apr 27, 2026 in langflow-ai/langflow • Updated May 5, 2026

Package

pip langflow (pip)

Affected versions

<= 1.8.4

Patched versions

1.9.0

Description

Summary

Langflow is vulnerable to Path Traversal in the Knowledge Bases API (DELETE /api/v1/knowledge_bases). This occurs because user-supplied knowledge base names are concatenated directly into file paths without proper sanitization or boundary validation. An authenticated attacker can exploit this flaw to delete arbitrary directories anywhere on the server's filesystem, leading to data loss and potential service disruption.

Details

The vulnerability exists in the delete_knowledge_bases_bulk function within src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/knowledge_bases.py.

This function constructs file paths directly from the user-supplied kb_names parameter. While other knowledge base endpoints safely route through standard path resolution (e.g., _resolve_kb_path()), the bulk delete handler bypasses this entirely. It builds the path manually and passes it directly to shutil.rmtree() without validating if the resulting path resolves outside the intended user directory.

PoC (Proof of Concept)

For the Bulk Delete endpoint, an authenticated attacker can supply a traversal sequence in the kb_names parameter:
../victim_user/kb_name

Because the path is passed directly to shutil.rmtree() without containment checks, this payload deletes directories outside the intended scope.

Impact

Any Langflow instance exposing this endpoint to authenticated users is vulnerable. This exposes the server to:

  • Cross-user data compromise: Deletion of directories within another tenant's knowledge base space.
  • Arbitrary filesystem manipulation: Directory deletion at any path on the server where the application has write permissions.
  • Service disruption & Data Loss: Deletion of critical application files or unrecoverable data loss if backups are co-located on the same filesystem.

Fixes

The issue was addressed in PR #12243, which applies Path.resolve() to normalize the supplied path and validates that it starts with the authenticated user's directory before deletion. Subsequent updates (backported from PR #12337) introduced robust containment checks using Path.is_relative_to() to prevent prefix-ambiguity bugs.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the security researchers who responsibly disclosed this vulnerability:

References

@AntonioABLima AntonioABLima published to langflow-ai/langflow Apr 27, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 5, 2026
Reviewed May 5, 2026
Last updated May 5, 2026

Severity

Critical

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-42048

GHSA ID

GHSA-9whx-c884-c68q

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.