Skip to content

Angular SSR has Open Redirect and Request Steering via Encoded X-Forwarded-Prefix

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Apr 30, 2026 in angular/angular-cli • Updated May 6, 2026

Package

npm @angular/ssr (npm)

Affected versions

>= 22.0.0-next.0, < 22.0.0-next.7
>= 21.0.0-next.0, < 21.2.9
>= 20.0.0-next.0, < 20.3.25
>= 19.0.0-next.0, < 19.2.25

Patched versions

22.0.0-next.7
21.2.9
20.3.25
19.2.25

Description

Description

A vulnerability exists in the X-Forwarded-Prefix header processing logic within Angular SSR. The internal validation mechanism fails to properly account for URL-encoded characters, specifically dots (%2e%2e). This allows an attacker to bypass security filters by injecting encoded path traversal sequences that are later decoded and utilized by the application logic.
When an Angular SSR application is configured to trust proxy headers and is deployed behind a proxy that forwards the X-Forwarded-Prefix header without prior sanitization, an attacker can provide a payload such as /%2e%2e/evil.

The vulnerability manifests in two ways:

  • Open Redirect: The application processes a redirect (e.g., router redirectTo). The decoded traversal payload manipulates the Location header, forcing the browser to an unintended path or external domain.
  • Server-Side Request Steering: The manipulated prefix is used as the base path for server-side HttpClient requests. This causes the server to make requests to unintended internal paths or external endpoints.

Attack Preconditions

  • The application must use Angular SSR.
  • The application must perform internal redirects or use relative URLs in server-side HttpClient requests.
  • The upstream infrastructure (Reverse Proxy/CDN) must pass the X-Forwarded-Prefix header to the SSR process without stripping or sanitizing it.

Workarounds

Until the patch is applied, developers should manually sanitize the X-Forwarded-Prefix header in their server.ts. The workaround involves decoding the component to catch encoded traversal attempts before normalization:

app.use((req, res, next) => {
  let prefix = req.headers['x-forwarded-prefix'];
  if (Array.isArray(prefix)) prefix = prefix[0];

  if (prefix) {
    try {
      // Decode the prefix to catch encoded characters like %2e (dots)
      const decodedPrefix = decodeURIComponent(prefix);
      
      // Sanitize: remove traversal attempts and ensure a safe leading slash
      req.headers['x-forwarded-prefix'] = decodedPrefix
        .replace(/\.\./g, '')       // Remove any dot-dot sequences
        .replace(/^[/\\]+/, '/');   // Ensure it starts with exactly one slash
    } catch (e) {
      // If decoding fails, remove the potentially malicious header entirely
      delete req.headers['x-forwarded-prefix'];
    }
  }
  next();
});

Configuring Trusted Proxy Headers

By default, Angular ignores all X-Forwarded-* headers. If your application is behind a trusted reverse proxy (like a load balancer) that sets these headers, you can configure Angular to trust them.
You can configure trustProxyHeaders when initializing the application engine:

const appEngine = new AngularAppEngine({
  // Trust specific headers
  trustProxyHeaders: ['x-forwarded-host', 'x-forwarded-proto', 'x-forwarded-prefix'], 
});

const nodeAppEngine = new AngularNodeAppEngine({
  // Trust all X-Forwarded-* headers
  trustProxyHeaders: true, 
});

Patches

  • 22.0.0-next.7
  • 21.2.9
  • 20.3.25
  • 19.2.25

Resources

References

@alan-agius4 alan-agius4 published to angular/angular-cli Apr 30, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 6, 2026
Reviewed May 6, 2026
Last updated May 6, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required None
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity Low
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality Low
Integrity Low
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. Learn more on MITRE.

URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')

The web application accepts a user-controlled input that specifies a link to an external site, and uses that link in a redirect. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-44437

GHSA ID

GHSA-69xr-m8h6-h664

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.