PEP 749 -- Implementing PEP 649

[JelleZijlstra]

Please consider PEP 749 -- Implementing PEP 649
https://peps.python.org/pep-0749/

• The PEP has been discussed in threads listed in its Post-History header: https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-749-implementing-pep-649/54974
• The PEP was announced on Discuss (link in Post-History)
• The PEP includes all relevant Suggested Sections
• The PEP includes endorsements from the projects/groups/people it helps (N/A)
• The PEP has a CODEOWNERS entry

SIG-specific:

• Typing PEPs: link to the Typing Council's recommendation for the PEP:
  • The PEP is typing-adjacent but affects primarily the runtime, not the type system, so I don't think this is necessary.
• Packaging PEPs: don't file the issue here, ask the delegate (Paul Moore) on Packaging Discourse

[JelleZijlstra]

I have a number of pending changes to the PEP in python/peps#4316, partly in response to the questions the SC sent to the Typing Council (which we'll hopefully be able to send a response for soon).

[warsaw]

PEP 749 accepted. Congratulations!