Skip to content

Queries: support for (capturing) tree-queries #12

@KaruroChori

Description

@KaruroChori

Aside from has and is, we need a capturing version of has which is able to represent a query tree.
It is way more complex to handle compared to the other two, so for now I will just pretend it is of lesser priority :).

More details and PoC soon in the docs.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions