Skip to content

Commit 2943201

Browse files
committed
improve things a bit
1 parent 1502cd8 commit 2943201

20 files changed

Lines changed: 214 additions & 193 deletions

File tree

epicshop/package-lock.json

Lines changed: 80 additions & 77 deletions
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about customizing how changed files appear on GitHub.
Lines changed: 33 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
1+
# Clarify MVP Outcomes
2+
3+
👨‍💼 We need an MVP scheduling app so small teams can quickly find a time that
4+
works for everyone. Before anyone writes implementation code, we need to be
5+
clear on the outcome we are trying to produce.
6+
7+
🐨 In this step, do not change application code. Create a short discovery note
8+
that includes:
9+
10+
1. The top 8-12 questions you would ask before building
11+
2. A first-pass list of assumptions (labeled as assumptions)
12+
3. Explicit MVP success criteria that could be validated later
13+
4. Known constraints (time, scope, dependencies, compliance, data concerns)
14+
15+
In real MVP work, start with a small, high-leverage stakeholder set:
16+
17+
- 💼 Berry the Business Owner (business goal and success metric owner)
18+
- 👤 Una the User (workflow reality and usability pain points)
19+
- Engineering counterpart (technical feasibility and delivery constraints)
20+
- Optional fourth stakeholder only if needed (legal/compliance or support/ops)
21+
22+
📝 As you work, keep your questions specific and decision-oriented. If an answer
23+
would not change your plan, that question is probably too vague.
24+
25+
💰 Helpful prompt format:
26+
27+
- What decision does this answer unlock?
28+
- What risk appears if this is wrong?
29+
- How would we validate this in the MVP?
30+
31+
📜 Reference your own planning notes while drafting. Keep your assumptions,
32+
constraints, and success criteria in one place so you can validate them in
33+
later steps.
Lines changed: 24 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
1+
# Clarify MVP Outcomes
2+
3+
👨‍💼 Great work. Before implementation, we now have a clearer definition of the
4+
problem we are solving and how we will judge success.
5+
6+
🦉 The important outcome is not perfect requirements. It is making ambiguity
7+
explicit early so tradeoffs can be intentional instead of accidental.
8+
9+
A strong deliverable from this step includes:
10+
11+
- Decision-oriented stakeholder questions
12+
- Clearly labeled assumptions
13+
- Measurable MVP success criteria
14+
- Constraints and risks that will shape implementation
15+
- Input from a small, relevant MVP stakeholder set (for example 💼 Berry and 👤 Una)
16+
17+
🧝‍♀️ I added a separate reference file with example stakeholder questions:
18+
`example-stakeholder-questions.md`.
19+
20+
Use it to calibrate quality and compare your own list. Your questions do not
21+
need to match word-for-word.
22+
23+
📝 Capture your final notes in a place you can reference in later steps. You
24+
will use this artifact to evaluate whether the MVP actually matched the intent.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)