fix(server): fix match no index

[LegendPei]

Purpose of the PR

• close [Bug] NoIndexException triggered by match()-step #2936

This PR fixes a NoIndexException triggered by match() traversals when preceding has() filters contain index-required predicates such as neq() or range predicates but the related properties are not indexed.

In this case, HugeGraph extracted these filters into HugeGraphStep and pushed them into backend ConditionQuery, causing backend index validation to reject the traversal before TinkerPop could evaluate the filters normally.

Main Changes

• Avoid extracting HasStep filters into HugeGraphStep when:

  • the following traversal step is match(), and
  • the has() predicate contains neq, gt, gte, lt, or lte.

• Keep those filters in the traversal so they are evaluated by the normal TinkerPop filter path instead of being forced into backend index query planning.

• Add a regression test covering the match() + no-index condition scenario from [Bug] NoIndexException triggered by match()-step #2936.

Verifying these changes

• Trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage. (No Need)
• Already covered by existing tests, such as (please modify tests here).
• Need tests and can be verified as follows:
  • mvn test -pl hugegraph-server/hugegraph-test -am -P core-test,rocksdb -Dtest=CountStrategyCoreTest#testMatchWithNoIndexConditionMatchesDirectTraversal -DfailIfNoTests=false
  • mvn test -pl hugegraph-server/hugegraph-test -am -P core-test,rocksdb -Dtest=CountStrategyCoreTest -DfailIfNoTests=false

Does this PR potentially affect the following parts?

• Dependencies (add/update license info & regenerate_known_dependencies.sh)
• Modify configurations
• The public API
• Other affects (typed here)
• Nope

Documentation Status

• Doc - TODO
• Doc - Done
• Doc - No Need